Re:Why Facebook Can't Become Twitter: Its Closed Nature
by patcito on Monday May 04, 2009 @05:54PM
(#593162)
MySpace had 20-30x the number of users that Facebook did not so long ago.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why Facebook Can't Become Twitter: Its Closed Nature
by aneesh on Monday May 04, 2009 @06:08PM
(#593182)
Looks like you'd have to go back to 2006, but yes, that was the case not too long ago.
Re:Why Facebook Can't Become Twitter: Its Closed Nature
by ryanwaggoner on Monday May 04, 2009 @08:41PM
(#593369)
Dumb question, but doesn't Google Trends cover searches, not traffic on the actual domain? Are we just assuming that the ratio of searches:traffic is pretty much the same for both sites?
Re:Why Facebook Can't Become Twitter: Its Closed Nature
by aneesh on Tuesday May 05, 2009 @12:16PM
(#594305)
Yes, you're absolutely right. I made that assumption, and justified it by seeing that Compete's numbers matched up well for the past 12 months (Compete unfortunately only goes back 1 year, hence I went to Google Trends).
Re:Why Facebook Can't Become Twitter: Its Closed Nature
by ryanwaggoner on Monday May 04, 2009 @08:40PM
(#593366)
That's a fair point. I still think that Facebook is in a much better long-term position than Twitter.