News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A useful program, 0 bytes long by StavrosK on Saturday June 22, 2013 @12:37PM (#5924197)
It's because people mainly perceive marginal costs in the goods they buy, and they don't consider fixed costs. In extreme cases like software, news, etc, they think "this extra copy didn't cost anything to produce, therefore it should be free", even though the initial fixed cost was substantial.

This leads to some things like perceiving less competent workers' time to be worth more than more competent ones' (because they take longer to do a task, therefore they should be paid more), etc.

Re:A useful program, 0 bytes long by icebraining on Saturday June 22, 2013 @02:12PM (#5924577)
I don't agree this was the case here. They were perfectly happy to pay for a copy of the software, even though making another copy - as you rightly point out - costs nothing.

They were annoyed because nothing had actually been copied. It's like paying for a product and getting an empty shipping box in the mail.

Re:A useful program, 0 bytes long by StavrosK on Saturday June 22, 2013 @02:18PM (#5924612)
Sure, if the product you're paying for is an empty box.
Re:A useful program, 0 bytes long by icebraining on Saturday June 22, 2013 @02:52PM (#5924724)
But they didn't know it was, which is why they felt cheated. It's not because of the marginal costs.
Re:A useful program, 0 bytes long by BHSPitMonkey on Monday June 24, 2013 @03:15PM (#5935025)
Well, an inode was "copied".