Re:A useful program, 0 bytes long
by icebraining on Saturday June 22, 2013 @02:12PM
(#5924577)
I don't agree this was the case here. They were perfectly happy to pay for a copy of the software, even though making another copy - as you rightly point out - costs nothing.
They were annoyed because nothing had actually been copied. It's like paying for a product and getting an empty shipping box in the mail.
Sure, if the product you're paying for is an empty box.
Re:A useful program, 0 bytes long
by icebraining on Saturday June 22, 2013 @02:52PM
(#5924724)
But they didn't know it was, which is why they felt cheated. It's not because of the marginal costs.
Re:A useful program, 0 bytes long
by BHSPitMonkey on Monday June 24, 2013 @03:15PM
(#5935025)
Well, an inode was "copied".
This leads to some things like perceiving less competent workers' time to be worth more than more competent ones' (because they take longer to do a task, therefore they should be paid more), etc.