Re:Huge 'Dead Zone' Predicted in Gulf of Mexico
by epoxyhockey on Thursday June 20, 2013 @03:23PM
(#5914286)
I'm curious if the dispersants used in the Deepwater Horizon oil spill of 2010 may have been a contributing factor in addition to fertilizers and agricultural runoff? Or should I consider the Deepwater Horizon aftereffects water under the bridge by now?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Huge 'Dead Zone' Predicted in Gulf of Mexico
by clarky07 on Thursday June 20, 2013 @03:38PM
(#5914390)
FTA: "Last year's dead zone was smaller than average"
I'm guessing that means that the oil spill isn't a contributing factor, and it's just the excess rain and subsequent runoff this year.
Re:Huge 'Dead Zone' Predicted in Gulf of Mexico
by benjamincburns on Thursday June 20, 2013 @03:50PM
(#5914468)
Hypoxic regions are caused by an influx of various nutrient-limited organisms (hence why fertilizer is bad) which trigger a feeding cycle that destabilizes and ultimately kills off the oxygen-producing organisms in the impacted region. Once they're gone, carnivorous inverts which survive well in low oxygen environments move in and stabilize the environment to its newly-barren state.
I don't know for certain, but I'd guess that the chemical dispersants actually contributed to the reduction of hypoxia, since it introduced a new limiting factor for the organisms which start the cycle. That said, I'm sure dispersants aren't biased in what they poison, so it's important to note that this is probably a positive-looking indicator masking devastatingly negative phenomenon.