Sam Odio and the EFF vs. Apple Inc.

Re:Sam Odio and the EFF vs. Apple Inc. by sfk on Saturday May 02, 2009 @02:16AM (#589606)

Frivolous abuse of the DMCA in order to suppress reverse engineering for interoperability purposes?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sam Odio and the EFF vs. Apple Inc. by zackattack on Saturday May 02, 2009 @01:37PM (#590047)

So evil means suppressing reverse engineering? Any company that suppresses reverse engineering is evil?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sam Odio and the EFF vs. Apple Inc. by wolverian on Saturday May 02, 2009 @02:38PM (#590102)

Classic strawman.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sam Odio and the EFF vs. Apple Inc. by zackattack on Saturday May 02, 2009 @01:50PM (#590057)

You are allowed to contribute to society, but only if you contribute something that can be used by someone however they want it. Otherwise, don't even bother contributing---making products that bring music to the world, or create jobs.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sam Odio and the EFF vs. Apple Inc. by zackattack on Saturday May 02, 2009 @01:54PM (#590061)

In order to create value in this society some aggressive behavior is typically deemed necessary. But this is win-lose behavior. Is it possible to think of a new, win-win paradigm?

==> Conclusion,

evil = win-lose

good = win-win

How's that for a definition of evil? All of the parent posts make a lot more sense now, to me.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sam Odio and the EFF vs. Apple Inc. by zackattack on Thursday May 07, 2009 @04:29AM (#597651)

Dialectical reasoning ftw.

[ Parent | on HN ]