News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Snowden: Feds can't cover up leaks by 'murdering me' by BruceIV on Monday June 17, 2013 @12:17PM (#5894015)
I think it's a little rich that Snowden is complaining about being labelled a traitor - morality aside, what he did seems like a pretty clear-cut case of treason from a legal standpoint (IANAL).
Re:Snowden: Feds can't cover up leaks by 'murdering me' by jwoah12 on Monday June 17, 2013 @12:19PM (#5894030)
Where is he complaining about it? I see this:

"Being called a traitor by Dick Cheney is the highest honor you can give an American"

Re:Snowden: Feds can't cover up leaks by 'murdering me' by BruceIV on Monday June 17, 2013 @12:28PM (#5894068)
There was something about not being able to get a fair trial stateside.

Although, I don't know what the laws are like in the States, but in Canada you can go to jail if you have security clearance and reveal information that if true would be classified. If the legal situation is similar in the US, he's pretty clearly guilty.

Re:Snowden: Feds can't cover up leaks by 'murdering me' by PavlovsCat on Monday June 17, 2013 @12:33PM (#5894122)
You're saying he shouldn't get a fair trial because it's a "clear-cut case" of him being a traitor. That is kind of the point, without a fair trial there is NO "case"; there is just power, blackmail and a whole lot of bootlicking.
Re:Snowden: Feds can't cover up leaks by 'murdering me' by datasage on Monday June 17, 2013 @12:33PM (#5894115)
What he did was disclose classified information. Which itself is illegal. But its a jump to automatically assume that disclosure of classified information is treason.

Now if he turns around and starts helping China with the information he has, then he will be pretty much done for.

Re:Snowden: Feds can't cover up leaks by 'murdering me' by PavlovsCat on Monday June 17, 2013 @12:32PM (#5894109)
And if you don't set morality aside? There can be such a gap between "legal" and "just", and before anyone asks me to set morality aside, I would love to first hear their arguments for me doing that, other than that they do it.
Re:Snowden: Feds can't cover up leaks by 'murdering me' by BruceIV on Monday June 17, 2013 @12:39PM (#5894163)
I was merely saying that I don't feel like arguing the morality of it, whereas he'd need a very clever lawyer and a sympathetic judge to get out of the treason charge should he ever stand trial.
Re:Snowden: Feds can't cover up leaks by 'murdering me' by habitue on Monday June 17, 2013 @01:41PM (#5894601)
Actually, it looks like treason will be a hard sell in Snowden's case: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/edward-snowden-92687.h...

From someone who is a lawyer:

“I do not believe it is treason,” said George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley. “There is nothing to suggest that his motivation was to assist our enemies or a foreign power.”

The gist of the article is that they would most likely prosecute him for espionage (which doesn't require him to be spying "for" anybody), and that the treason/traitor allegations by officials are for rhetorical effect (though they mention it isn't entirely impossible to charge him with treason using some very tortured logic).

Re:Snowden: Feds can't cover up leaks by 'murdering me' by BruceIV on Monday June 17, 2013 @02:19PM (#5894896)
Interesting. Thanks for the heads up.