News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple’s Commitment to Customer Privacy by szc on Monday June 17, 2013 @05:23AM (#5892183)
Security Professionals: Read section 109(b). Pay attention to (1)(B,C,E,F,I,K). Talk to your lawyers and accountants. Your company "reputation" has a value. What is it worth (50-75% of stock market value)?

Read 109(b)(2). You want option (B).

Re:Apple’s Commitment to Customer Privacy by tripzilch on Monday June 17, 2013 @10:55AM (#5893520)
What does this mean?
Re:Apple’s Commitment to Customer Privacy by dvanduzer on Monday June 17, 2013 @01:04PM (#5894345)
Is this[0] what you're looking for?

szc is saying that carriers should include lost business / damaged reputation, when reporting the costs of complying with the legislation.

Say it costs Verizon $10 million to build the infrastructure to let the government listen in. Verizon could claim that the revelation of this program will cost them $10 billion in future lost business. Since the Attorney General is unlikely to approve such an expense, Verizon would be declared compliant without actually having to turn anything over.

It's an interesting loophole in theory, but probably wouldn't actually work.

[0] https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Communications_Assistance_for....

edit: the anchor tag isn't getting parsed correctly: http://bit.ly/14Gbifo

Re:Apple’s Commitment to Customer Privacy by szc on Monday June 17, 2013 @12:47PM (#5894223)
There is a provision for not having to do CALEA.

You have to show it would cost too much and the US Government refuses to pay you to do it.