Re:Obama does not feel Americans' privacy violated
by rayiner on Sunday June 16, 2013 @06:22PM
(#5890274)
If we're going with a cost/benefit analysis, it should be noted that the NSA accessing data that AT&T, Google, Facebook, etc, already collect is just about the cheapest sort of counter-measure you could have to terrorism. The "good old fashioned police work" that people keep suggesting would be far more expensive and invasive.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Obama does not feel Americans' privacy violated
by stretchwithme on Sunday June 16, 2013 @06:40PM
(#5890351)
Then let people volunteer for it in exchange for lower taxes. If the impact is truly minor, there should be many takers and much savings.
Re:Obama does not feel Americans' privacy violated
by rayiner on Sunday June 16, 2013 @07:05PM
(#5890437)
That makes no sense.
Re:Obama does not feel Americans' privacy violated
by CamperBob2 on Sunday June 16, 2013 @11:18PM
(#5891237)
What makes no sense is assuming that all of the data collection being discussed has prevented a single genuine attack.
Re:Obama does not feel Americans' privacy violated
by stretchwithme on Wednesday June 19, 2013 @12:05AM
(#5903687)
Oh, they told us it has. Shouldn't that be good enough? They've been open and honest so far.