Re:Migrate from FeedBurner
by antr on Sunday June 16, 2013 @06:36AM
(#5888061)
My company has a blog with c. 40,000 RSS subs, and the most valuable FeedBurner feature is the tracking/visitor display option. On the other hand, this new service wants users to pay for it... competing with free tends to be a lost battle.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I suppose they're betting on people who don't want to trust Google with anything regarding RSS these days. I wouldn't think FeedBurner will be shut down (as it must be useful for crawling), but I could understand people being worried.
I understand the whole "trusting Google" thing, but RSS ain't email or search behaviour. These RSS services are simply passthrough/syndication services, and no real sensitive data is handled (unless I'm missing something else?).
Google has been killing most of its RSS-related products (most notably Reader). People are concerned FeedBurner might be next.
Re:Migrate from FeedBurner
by PavlovsCat on Sunday June 16, 2013 @09:52AM
(#5888434)
Yeah, worrying about Feedburner is not new.
http://css-tricks.com/lets-say-feedburner-shuts-down/
This recent NSA stuff may help with motivating people to actually switch, but it's not really needed as a reason.
Re:Migrate from FeedBurner
by johnchristopher on Sunday June 16, 2013 @07:36AM
(#5888158)
I think it's more about trusting google to keep the service running.