News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sympathy for the Luddites by dllthomas on Friday June 14, 2013 @08:17PM (#5883295)
"Sure, but who decides what the right number is for a basic income?"

I addressed a very similar question in an earlier thread on topic (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5658967). It's short and directly applicable enough I'll just copy:

Like any policy question, the answer is:

Ideally, the level will be set to what will produce the best outcome based on our current understanding of the world, where the precise parameters under which 'best' is determined is negotiated through a fair political and/or economic process.

In practice, the question is how we best approximate that. The shape of that should be informed by economics, and will likely depend on the particular country.

All of that said, I agree it's a key factor to look at when assessing a particular BI proposal; I don't think it's an unanswerable question.

Re:Sympathy for the Luddites by msandford on Saturday June 15, 2013 @12:16AM (#5884007)
Okay, I get it. I think it's basically unanswerable but I'm happy to agree to disagree.
Re:Sympathy for the Luddites by sp332 on Saturday June 15, 2013 @08:52AM (#5884893)
Maybe we won't get it exactly right, but I think the answer is greater than 0 which means right now, we're doing it wrong.
Re:Sympathy for the Luddites by eropple on Saturday June 15, 2013 @05:26AM (#5884584)
It's no more unanswerable than interest rates or tax levels. You tweak the knob until you get the result you want.