News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court rules human genes may not be patented by salemh on Thursday June 13, 2013 @02:20PM (#5875664)
Interesting comment and explanation, I was wondering why shares were rising in Myriad and the industry:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/myriad-genetics-share...

The high court ruled that genes naturally found in the body cannot be patented, but that synthetically created genetic material, called cDNA, can be patented. That leaves an opening for Myriad to continue making money, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in the court’s majority decision.

The Supreme Court's move triggered a rally in genetic companies, while none as powerful as Myriad's gains. Industry giant Amgen rose 75 cents, or 0.8%, to $97.12. Smaller genetic companies such as Vermillion, Enzo Biochem and Qiagen rose 1%, 0.9% and 0.7% respectively.

Re:Supreme Court rules human genes may not be patented by aroch on Thursday June 13, 2013 @02:29PM (#5875733)
I suppose I could be happy about it since I'm a share holder in Amgen and Qiagen.