Re:Unique in the Crowd: The privacy bounds of human mobility
by n1cked on Wednesday June 12, 2013 @07:52PM
(#5871487)
I worked in a lab at Univserity that had several projects using gait analysis. It is very identifying, but much harder to collect than this kind of data -- you need a physical device on the target.
Re:Unique in the Crowd: The privacy bounds of human mobility
by samolang on Wednesday June 12, 2013 @07:55PM
(#5871498)
Still, it could be very useful for intelligence agencies. If they have identified that a phone is being used by a terrorist they can identify which terrorist is carrying it if they're able to get access to its accelerometer. Or they could gain access to millions of phones' accelerometers and identify which ones are being used by known terrorists. At the very least I expect to see it in some spy movies in the next few years.
Re:Unique in the Crowd: The privacy bounds of human mobility
by jevinskie on Wednesday June 12, 2013 @08:02PM
(#5871533)
Given the recent leaks, I think we should start using "terrorist" in quotes, at least when referring to NSA "terrorists".
Re:Unique in the Crowd: The privacy bounds of human mobility
by wcfields on Wednesday June 12, 2013 @07:57PM
(#5871510)
Don't most people carry a mobile with them?
EDIT: Found a paper on the subject from 2009: http://www.cs.yale.edu/homes/mfn3/pub/mfn_gait_id.pdf
EDIT 2: Found another paper from 2012 claiming 99.4% accuracy: http://users.ece.cmu.edu/~juefeix/btas_2012_felix.pdf