Maybe you should try reading more than 2 paragraphs before commenting, it makes you sound a lot more informed.

Maybe the author should write meaningful pieces that actually contain even a modicum of objectivity. It's basically exactly the same as a handful of other pieces he's written about how he doesn't like GNOME because they were 'mean' to him (even though based on everything he really seems to have deserved the punishments dealt to him).

Sorry, but it peeves me that his articles still get near the top. They're worthless diatribes against a project that doesn't care about his input. And, more importantly, doesn't need or want to care about his input.

I'll admit I didnt' finish it... how could I? it was too painful...