Re:Court found NSA surveillance unconstitutional in 2011
by samolang on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @04:10PM
(#5864397)
Knowing that Hitler heavily leveraged propaganda to further his cause might be of use to an individual. I don't think knowing Goebbels' name is necessary for learning such lessons though.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Court found NSA surveillance unconstitutional in 2011
by jlgreco on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @06:07PM
(#5865028)
Possibly true, though I would question the quality of any lesson about Nazi propaganda that did not mention Goebbels' name. If you are doing the "3-lesson 10,000 foot overview" of the 1930s and 40s then I can see how Goebbels' would escape mention, but otherwise he is definitely in the top 10 figures to mention.
Re:Court found NSA surveillance unconstitutional in 2011
by samolang on Wednesday June 12, 2013 @08:48AM
(#5867767)
I don't know about you, but I tend to forget details that I don't regularly use. I have learned about Goebbels and forgotten his name at least once. I focus primarily on remembering the lessons learned because I know I am likely to forget details such as names. I can usually remember the overall lesson learned because it resonates with my intuition and world knowledge.
Re:Court found NSA surveillance unconstitutional in 2011
by dllthomas on Wednesday June 12, 2013 @11:26AM
(#5868569)
Not knowing the names of prominent figures is some (quite inconclusive) evidence of insufficient familiarity. Any encouragement of the type I was speaking of should recognize that (and should be polite on other counts as well, of course) or is not entirely appropriate.