GNUnet - Hackdot

Re:GNUnet by e1ven on Saturday June 08, 2013 @02:10PM (#5845680)

I find that I like I2p quite a bit, but I'm not as fond of the reference implementation. It's in Java, which makes running it on small systems more difficult, and it routes traffic by default.

Routing by default GREATLY improves the network, but may be undesirable/unrequested behavior by people.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GNUnet by thelukester on Sunday June 09, 2013 @07:51AM (#5848519)

For you I2P users, What are you using for P2P software, I2PSnark, iMule, or I2Phex? I tried it a few years ago, but didn't have much success in finding anything. Any tips for setting up, searching, performance tweaks?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GNUnet by papul1993 on Saturday June 08, 2013 @02:46PM (#5845812)

Yeah. I want to host an i2p site on my AWS free tier account but can't because it will exceed the 15 GB bandwidth limit due to all the volunteer routing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GNUnet by cmpctyd on Saturday June 08, 2013 @03:42PM (#5846035)

You can disable/lower routing. There is also bandwidth limiting. I don't recommend disabling the routing entirely, however.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GNUnet by cmpctyd on Saturday June 08, 2013 @03:43PM (#5846037)

"small systems"; I get that it can be hell-like on very small systems but the Raspberry Pi works great.

There's a thread on zzz.i2p about it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GNUnet by krenoten on Saturday June 08, 2013 @04:46PM (#5846280)

If you're interested in running networking applications on small hardware, you may be interested in the Beaglebone. It's more expensive, but vastly outperforms the Pi with regards to network I/O. The Pi is awesome for video, however.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GNUnet by e1ven on Saturday June 08, 2013 @04:38PM (#5846247)

It's ENTIRELY possible that that I didn't tune it correctly, but when I was looking at it as a routing underlayer for Tavern.com, it didn't leave me a whole lot of resources for running my apps.

[ Parent | on HN ]