Larry Page addresses PRISM

Re:Larry Page addresses PRISM by rayiner on Friday June 07, 2013 @07:23PM (#5842744)

I'm not saying otherwise. But flaming the government for acting Unconstitutionally for activity that is not contrary to the text of the document is lame and misleading.

If you think there should be a right to privacy of electronic communications, then convince people of it. Get an amendment passe. Don't twist the Constitution to say what you wish it said.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Larry Page addresses PRISM by lifeguard on Friday June 07, 2013 @08:03PM (#5842928)

I disagree with your definition of papers. And that is why we have Judges.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Larry Page addresses PRISM by rayiner on Friday June 07, 2013 @08:41PM (#5843066)

Your disagreement isn't with my definition of "papers" (we both probably agree that "papers" can easily be read to encompass both physical and digital documents). Your disagreement is with my assertion that handing your "papers" over to a third party robs you of any 4th amendment interest you might have had in those documents.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Larry Page addresses PRISM by foobarbazqux on Friday June 07, 2013 @09:23PM (#5843218)

What happens with safety deposit boxes?

[ Parent | on HN ]