News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Larry Page addresses PRISM by drivebyacct2 on Friday June 07, 2013 @04:42PM (#5841687)
They'd have to MITM SSL traffic largely.

Also, that's what they were doing for more traditional wiretaps and you should be sure that they have access to siphon off live traffic for analysis if they want.

Re:Larry Page addresses PRISM by dllthomas on Friday June 07, 2013 @05:12PM (#5841932)
"They'd have to MITM SSL traffic largely."

To be fair, if anyone can do this it's precisely these people.

... still not likely, though, I agree.

Re:Larry Page addresses PRISM by reedlaw on Friday June 07, 2013 @05:39PM (#5842131)
Is that even possible if Google's SSL certs have Extended Validation? They'd have to have cooperation all the way down to the browser vendors and I can't see Mozilla caving that easily.
Re:Larry Page addresses PRISM by amatix on Friday June 07, 2013 @08:40PM (#5843060)
There are several governments (Spain, France, Netherlands, Japan) who publicly have Root CAs in the trusted browser list[1]. It seems pretty likely (cf say, Prism) that the NSA has a CA cert where they can generate whatever certificates they want in order to MITM browser SSL communications...

[1] http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/certs/

Re:Larry Page addresses PRISM by reedlaw on Friday June 07, 2013 @09:27PM (#5843232)
Can we remove Root CAs from our browser?

Edit: Found the answer: https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:UserCertDB

Re:Larry Page addresses PRISM by dllthomas on Friday June 07, 2013 @06:14PM (#5842369)
I was referring to cryptographic attacks. Unlikely that they have such, but if anyone does, it's pretty likely to be them.