News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Introducing ClusterFsck: Filebased S3 Configuration Kontrol by jabbernotty on Friday June 07, 2013 @02:25PM (#5840685)
Is this based on Amazon S3 because you have that at hand, or is it based on it because of some innate advantage?
Re:Introducing ClusterFsck: Filebased S3 Configuration Kontrol by bglusman on Friday June 07, 2013 @02:46PM (#5840841)
A little bit of both I guess? It's become standard enough that most web developers (at least most I know) have an account and use it for a few things here and there, it's dirt cheap and widely available, and it's just text files we're storing, so nothing more heavy weight is needed. It does also offer versioning, which I believe we may add a feature to take advantage of for rolling back configuration changes in a coherent way if something goes wrong or to recreate a problem locally on a certain date, but don't think we've started even planning that yet (pull requests welcome!)
Re:Introducing ClusterFsck: Filebased S3 Configuration Kontrol by tobowers on Friday June 07, 2013 @03:06PM (#5840973)
And, importantly, has ACL controls built in so it's easy to add/remove access to team members.
Re:Introducing ClusterFsck: Filebased S3 Configuration Kontrol by toomuchtodo on Friday June 07, 2013 @02:55PM (#5840897)
Don't forget that its highly durable. When was the last time S3 was down?
Re:Introducing ClusterFsck: Filebased S3 Configuration Kontrol by lox on Friday June 07, 2013 @07:26PM (#5842762)
Have you had any issues with eventual consistency? Does this need to be run on US-west or EU for read-after-write consistency?
Re:Introducing ClusterFsck: Filebased S3 Configuration Kontrol by nodata on Friday June 07, 2013 @04:40PM (#5841667)
Amazon is not involved in Prism, it seems. So that helps.