Re:Logical Fallacies Are Usually Irrelevant or Cited Incorre...
by EthanHeilman on Thursday June 06, 2013 @05:50PM
(#5835387)
hacker789 previous comments have an anti-feminist bent (see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5573103) so I would suggest that it is coloring hacker789's judgement of this piece. This is probably why hacker789 talks about the authors motivations or secret intentions (similar to what I am doing to hacker789 now).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Logical Fallacies Are Usually Irrelevant or Cited Incorre...
by lucisferre on Thursday June 06, 2013 @06:37PM
(#5835635)
Using ad hominem against the ad hominem of a response to a piece about the use of logical fallacies. This. Is. So. Meta.
Love it.
Re:Logical Fallacies Are Usually Irrelevant or Cited Incorre...
by hacker789 on Thursday June 06, 2013 @06:10PM
(#5835491)
"Feminist" is such a broad brush that labeling something "anti-feminist" isn't very useful.
But you're still right—like anyone, my biases can color my judgement of things, often causing me to prejudge a written piece based on its author. This time, I was right; often, I am not.