Re:How the Robots Lost: High-Frequency Trading's Rise and Fall
by notahacker on Thursday June 06, 2013 @03:36PM
(#5834674)
And to take your example a step further, the lower risk of a large mutual fund being unable to offload assets quickly enough could result it allocating more funds to an IPO used to raise funds for a company that actually makes stuff.
The caveats are (i) there are diminishing returns to what trades add in terms of wealth because reducing time and cost of offloading stock a further 15 milliseconds and 0.001% clearly isn't going to radically alter the risks of investing in productive enterprises as reducing the time and cost of selling stock by an hour and 5% was (ii) certain trading behaviours can actually scare real investors away.
The HFT's profits do come from a large mutual fund, but then that large mutual fund can lower it's risk because it can quickly move from one position to another because it can expect a HFT to buy whatever it is selling. Risk has a price (ask an insurance company) and reducing it adds value to the economy.
Perhaps HFT was very lucrative for a while, but competition has naturally squeezed the margins out, but the markets has all the benefits of having HFT around.