Re:Judge: Child porn suspect doesn't need to decrypt files t...
by schrodinger on Wednesday June 05, 2013 @09:53AM
(#5825524)
HFS+ is not exactly uncommon
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Judge: Child porn suspect doesn't need to decrypt files t...
by nknighthb on Wednesday June 05, 2013 @10:42AM
(#5825869)
As a full-time Mac user for 8 years, and a Linux user for much of the decade before that, I am acutely aware of how common many filesystems, including HFS+, actually are.
If OS X ever breaks 10% (and still uses HFS+ at that time), I'll reconsider my judgement of its commonality.
Re:Judge: Child porn suspect doesn't need to decrypt files t...
by davidcuddeback on Wednesday June 05, 2013 @01:01PM
(#5826914)
I'm writing this from a computer with two partitions: one HFS+ running OSX and one Ext4 running Linux. These are both the default options when installing OSX (Mountain Lion) and Ubuntu 12.04, respectively:
Re:Judge: Child porn suspect doesn't need to decrypt files t...
by nknighthb on Wednesday June 05, 2013 @01:03PM
(#5826929)
Of course you are. And if you took a poll of HN users, you might even find OS X + Linux near a majority. That has nothing at all to do with what filesystems the vast majority of people are using, much less what they'd be using with TrueCrypt.
Re:Judge: Child porn suspect doesn't need to decrypt files t...
by schrodinger on Wednesday June 05, 2013 @12:24PM
(#5826608)
It's over 7%, I still wouldn't call that uncommon and say few people use it.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_syst...