News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Judge: Child porn suspect doesn't need to decrypt files t... by i_are_crd on Wednesday June 05, 2013 @09:44AM (#5825474)
"More suspicious" is meaningless. If you can't prove - with incontrovertible evidence and beyond any reasonable doubt - that there's something there, then there's plausible deniability.
Re:Judge: Child porn suspect doesn't need to decrypt files t... by nitrogen on Wednesday June 05, 2013 @12:46PM (#5826779)
Plausible deniability won't protect you from the "rubber hose" of a contempt charge.