Re:Visual Studio 2013
by MartinCron on Monday June 03, 2013 @03:37PM
(#5815383)
The full version vs. service pack distinction doesn't really matter to me.
It makes a lot of difference to some PHB's, though.
I'm pretty sure I can upgrade to a service pack. Changing versions, OTOH, probably requires approval from management.
Re:Visual Studio 2013
by MartinCron on Monday June 03, 2013 @04:47PM
(#5815899)
It sounds like you have bigger problems than can be addressed by the hard-working people in Redmond.
Undoubtedly, you're correct :)
Re:Visual Studio 2013
by dragonwriter on Monday June 03, 2013 @07:14PM
(#5816717)
> I'm pretty sure I can upgrade to a service pack. Changing versions, OTOH, probably requires approval from management.
Two things are apparent: 1) The problem you are addressing is a management problem in your organization, not a problem with Microsoft releasing a new version of VS. 2) You aren't the decision-making customer for Microsoft VS at your organization, so even the problem you had was with VS, it wouldn't necessarily be a problem MS would have much incentive to address.
I agree with you but a Service Pack should suffice esp. right after you've release a full new version/update to a major product/tool like VS.