News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bitcoin sentiment analysis by gigq on Saturday June 01, 2013 @04:05PM (#5805732)
With everyone anticipating an even bigger crash and given all the bad news in May it's surprising bitcoin has remained relatively stable.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/05/31/w...

Re:Bitcoin sentiment analysis by pixie_ on Saturday June 01, 2013 @04:52PM (#5805959)
It's the same cycle Bitcoin has been in for the past few years. The price is stable, but when the hype train starts running it goes on a ride for a month or so until it runs out of steam, and the price eventually stabilizes again. This is a good time to buy.
Re:Bitcoin sentiment analysis by mrb on Saturday June 01, 2013 @04:28PM (#5805831)
What a surprisingly naive post from Timothy! The reason these events did not affect Bitcoin's price is simply because they are all (except 1) affecting mostly the US market, wich is a tiny fraction of the worldwide Bitcoin market.

As to the Coinlab vs. MtGox lawsuit, people know that these companies care about Bitcoin above anything else, so they won't let the lawsuit affect it. Eg. if people started panic-selling, you can bet they would work a settlement to stop the panic.

Re:Bitcoin sentiment analysis by lordgilman on Saturday June 01, 2013 @05:35PM (#5806116)
> the US market, wich is a tiny fraction of the worldwide Bitcoin market

How do you come to this conclusion? Take a look at the volume on bitcoincharts. mtgoxUSD is beating the pants off everything in terms of volume. It also loses tons of volume after the seizure on the 17th. This is pretty consistent with the idea that most BTCers are in the United States (most of the exchange volume is BTC<>USD) and their behavior changed drastically right when Dwolla was seized (the volume died after the 17th).

Re:Bitcoin sentiment analysis by mrb on Saturday June 01, 2013 @08:34PM (#5806739)
"How do you come to this conclusion?"

1. Why do you equate mtgoxUSD to the US market? The majority of MtGox customers trading USD are non-americans.

2. Only ~20% of the Bitcoin connected nodes are located in the USA: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-05-27/mapping-bitcoins-gl...

3. Only ~9% of the world internet users are americans, making the USA a tiny market with respect to the potential future of Bitcoin.

4. bitcoincharts exclude many foreign exchanges (metabank in Russia, where Bitcoin is HUGE), all private trades (eg. Avalon claimed they sold all the bitcoins they needed to sell to build their 110nm ASIC at TSMC, to private buyers in China; the fact they were able to do this with no pb just tells you how big private trading is in China), etc.

Re:Bitcoin sentiment analysis by lordgilman on Sunday June 02, 2013 @05:30AM (#5807873)
> The majority of MtGox customers trading USD are non-americans

So why does their volume drop off after the 17th? That's the reason why I brought that up - only Americans are effected by the Dwolla closure.

Re:Bitcoin sentiment analysis by wamatt on Saturday June 01, 2013 @05:27PM (#5806092)
> What a surprisingly naive post from Timothy! The reason these events did not affect Bitcoin's price is simply because they are all (except 1) affecting mostly the US market, wich is a tiny fraction of the worldwide Bitcoin market.

While there is a clear trend towards globalization of Bitcoin underway, the USA historically and currently, dominates the lion's share of the market. [1][2]

[1] http://bitcoinstatus.rowit.co.uk/countryHostsMonth.png

[2] http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-05-27/mapping-bitcoins-gl...

Re:Bitcoin sentiment analysis by mrb on Saturday June 01, 2013 @08:37PM (#5806747)
[1] is grossly outdated: it was last updated in Oct 2012:

  $ HEAD http://bitcoinstatus.rowit.co.uk/countryHostsMonth.png
  [...]
  Last-Modified: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 05:05:27 GMT
Things change quickly in the Bitcoin world. Stats that are 8 months old are absolutely not a good indicator of today.

And indeed, [2], which is from this week, directly contradicts [1]: it shows that the share of Bitcoin nodes located in the USA is only 20% (and has been dwindling). China already equated or surpassed the USA (they are also at 20%).

Re:Bitcoin sentiment analysis by gojomo on Saturday June 01, 2013 @06:00PM (#5806180)
A lawsuit over who owns MtGox's US-focused business can be viewed as a bullish signal – people fight more over valuable things.
Re:Bitcoin sentiment analysis by dhammack on Saturday June 01, 2013 @05:21PM (#5806061)
Awesome.

Is there a way to overlay the price? Also, it may be because it has just launched, but it would be cool to see a longer history with overlaid price.

Why stop at bitcoin? I'm sure the infrastructure you've developed can adapt to different keywords (company/product names).

Re:Bitcoin sentiment analysis by basdevries on Saturday June 01, 2013 @06:02PM (#5806192)
I'm not the founder of the site, but Patrick Min is (patrickmin.com). I'm sure he'll read this!
Re:Bitcoin sentiment analysis by pizza on Saturday June 01, 2013 @07:19PM (#5806484)
Aha! When this gets popular and people treat it as the go-to bitcoin oracle, all I'll need to do is make some Twitter accounts with negative sentiment, and buy low, and then tweet some positive sentiments, and sell high!
Re:Bitcoin sentiment analysis by calpaterson on Saturday June 01, 2013 @04:59PM (#5805991)
This is cool. It would be nice to make it easier to browse positive and negative tweets/articles
Re:Bitcoin sentiment analysis by pyvpx on Saturday June 01, 2013 @03:57PM (#5805682)
that's cool. so, how does it work?
Re:Bitcoin sentiment analysis by ZirconCode on Saturday June 01, 2013 @08:06PM (#5806652)
I'm interested as-well. At least in sentiment analysis. Library name, anything~
Re:Bitcoin sentiment analysis by tobykier on Sunday June 02, 2013 @01:48AM (#5807497)
needs normalisation so you can see meaningful changes in sentiment.