Re:Disclosure timeline for vulnerabilities under active attack
by whateverfor on Friday May 31, 2013 @12:02AM
(#5796768)
It's more neutral because it takes out a bunch of useful information and leaves practically nothing left, like a news story that's unbiased because it doesn't bother actually saying any facts. The original title doesn't even explain that Google is changing their policy. I understand wanting to remove editorializing, but there's a difference between that and adding some detail from the article itself to a rather contentless title.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.