Re:Machine Learning as a Service
by jaytaylor on Thursday May 30, 2013 @11:04PM
(#5796609)
Terabytes are cheap compared to my time. I've also never required that much training data, so perhaps your use case does not lend itself to these services. I've built automated ML model training systems myself with TreeNet and Mahout, as well as used API-based ML systems, and I'm comfortable saying there is a strong case to be made for services which save much unnecessary effort.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Storing terabytes is cheap. Terabytes of bandwidth is very very expensive.
Some old links on the cost of terabytes of bandwidth
http://josephscott.org/archives/2009/01/how-much-does-one-te...
And that assumes you're willing to host with those providers, many of whom don't provide computing power. Also, the machine learning service you are using has to pay again for that bandwidth too and that cost gets passed along to you.