News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Machine Learning as a Service by jaytaylor on Thursday May 30, 2013 @11:04PM (#5796609)
Terabytes are cheap compared to my time. I've also never required that much training data, so perhaps your use case does not lend itself to these services. I've built automated ML model training systems myself with TreeNet and Mahout, as well as used API-based ML systems, and I'm comfortable saying there is a strong case to be made for services which save much unnecessary effort.
Re:Machine Learning as a Service by raylu on Friday May 31, 2013 @12:58AM (#5796939)
Storing terabytes is cheap. Terabytes of bandwidth is very very expensive.
Re:Machine Learning as a Service by neeleshs on Friday May 31, 2013 @01:46AM (#5797063)
Some old links on the cost of terabytes of bandwidth http://josephscott.org/archives/2009/01/how-much-does-one-te...
Re:Machine Learning as a Service by raylu on Friday May 31, 2013 @02:41PM (#5800506)
And that assumes you're willing to host with those providers, many of whom don't provide computing power. Also, the machine learning service you are using has to pay again for that bandwidth too and that cost gets passed along to you.
Re:Machine Learning as a Service by ivanist on Friday May 31, 2013 @09:43AM (#5798513)
Transferring 1TB at a sustained rate of 1MB/s will take about 11.5 days.