News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Challenge HN: Break my in-browser crypto for $1000 by bloblaw on Thursday May 30, 2013 @08:49AM (#5792130)
> [..] but I take issue with the "break SSL = break JS crypto" argument.

Respectfully, I'd suggest that this is not the argument.

The argument is that breaking SSL = accessing the data the crypto protects. Crypto is a means to an end...which is protecting sensitive information. moxie decidedly did not "break" the crypto, because he didn't have to.

It's a bit like a bank vault with the world's strongest door, but when it was installed they put in a 4' x 5' window next to the door. The vault door (aka the crypto) is fine and unbroken, but I still can get access to your money because your security system has a weak point.

Re:Challenge HN: Break my in-browser crypto for $1000 by lawnchair_larry on Thursday May 30, 2013 @08:07PM (#5796052)
But it's not a given that you can "break" SSL. The problem that moxie is highlighting actually has no solution (even HSTS isn't a solution) and relies on users to not notice that they have been downgraded to HTTP.

Unless moxie also wants to say, with a straight face, that twitter and gmail would be better off disabling HTTPS, I don't think that claim is fair.