Re:Creaky Voice: Another Example of Young Women's Linguistic...
by leephillips on Wednesday May 29, 2013 @02:15PM
(#5787984)
I think I get all that. So is there room for the idea of a vernacular that is not a "real English", to use your term? Or not the "relative equal" of Standard English? Can there be, or are there in the wild, vernaculars that are something other than these things?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Creaky Voice: Another Example of Young Women's Linguistic...
by Cushman on Wednesday May 29, 2013 @02:56PM
(#5788298)
Absolutely, and I would take jargons as an example. American Legal English is a kind of English, but it's not "real" in the sense that there are ideas in English that it can't properly express, and vice versa, and even skilled legal practitioners frequently make inconsistent mistakes. This is predicted by the fact that it is learned in adulthood; the language has no native speakers. Conversely, among languages spoken from birth, we expect and find that they are internally consistent and of roughly equivalent expressive value.