News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Non-blocking transactional atomicity.

Re:Non-blocking transactional atomicity by yxhuvud on Wednesday May 29, 2013 @04:44AM (#5785287)
Getting only 4.8% percent of throughput for reads doesn't seem stellar. Why is this so bad?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Non-blocking transactional atomicity by pbailis on Wednesday May 29, 2013 @05:06AM (#5785334)
Ha--good catch! I don't know if anyone else noticed that. I meant to say "within 33-4.8% of the peak throughput..." That is, we're 95.2% of the peak, not 4.8% of the peak. Fixed, thanks!
[ Parent | on HN ]