Re:Pure: a set of small, responsive CSS modules
by hobonumber1 on Tuesday May 28, 2013 @09:46AM
(#5779989)
What irks you about it?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Pure: a set of small, responsive CSS modules
by devmach on Tuesday May 28, 2013 @10:30PM
(#5784225)
There is too much options [0] and it's more flexible than it should be. I know , it sounds weird but with bootstrap all you have is 12 columns and when you have less options it's easy to plan.
Maybe the other problem is : Units are not in multiplies of 5 and that forces you unnecessarily to think. If it would be in fixed units like bootstrap or in multiplies of 5 ( pure-u-3-25 etc.) i would be less thinking while deciding the length of some div.
Re:Pure: a set of small, responsive CSS modules
by envex on Tuesday May 28, 2013 @09:52AM
(#5780016)
It just seems a tad unnecessary.
Why not use something like "2-cols/2-columns/pure-2"?
Re:Pure: a set of small, responsive CSS modules
by juandopazo on Tuesday May 28, 2013 @10:01AM
(#5780068)
The idea is that you can combine columns of different sizes. If you want a column of 1/3 of the width and another of 2/3, then you just need to add pure-u-1-3 and pure-u-2-3. Maybe you're right and the "u" is unnecessary.