News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pure: a set of small, responsive CSS modules by hobonumber1 on Tuesday May 28, 2013 @09:46AM (#5779989)
What irks you about it?
Re:Pure: a set of small, responsive CSS modules by devmach on Tuesday May 28, 2013 @10:30PM (#5784225)
There is too much options [0] and it's more flexible than it should be. I know , it sounds weird but with bootstrap all you have is 12 columns and when you have less options it's easy to plan.

Maybe the other problem is : Units are not in multiplies of 5 and that forces you unnecessarily to think. If it would be in fixed units like bootstrap or in multiplies of 5 ( pure-u-3-25 etc.) i would be less thinking while deciding the length of some div.

[0] : http://yuilibrary.com/yui/docs/cssgrids/#unit-sizes

Re:Pure: a set of small, responsive CSS modules by envex on Tuesday May 28, 2013 @09:52AM (#5780016)
It just seems a tad unnecessary.

Why not use something like "2-cols/2-columns/pure-2"?

Re:Pure: a set of small, responsive CSS modules by juandopazo on Tuesday May 28, 2013 @10:01AM (#5780068)
The idea is that you can combine columns of different sizes. If you want a column of 1/3 of the width and another of 2/3, then you just need to add pure-u-1-3 and pure-u-2-3. Maybe you're right and the "u" is unnecessary.
Re:Pure: a set of small, responsive CSS modules by saltcod on Tuesday May 28, 2013 @09:55AM (#5780033)
I'd prefer something more explicit, personally.

pure-row, pure-col-1-2.....