News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Soylent: Gruel today, gruel tomorrow by pbreit on Monday May 27, 2013 @11:21PM (#5777834)
The OP created a false dichotomy. No one is requiring soylent 21 times per week. Save up your enthusiasm and make 4 or 5 excellent meals per week. You'll even enjoy them more than you would have.
Re:Soylent: Gruel today, gruel tomorrow by jckt on Monday May 27, 2013 @11:41PM (#5777906)
That was the main selling point, though, as I understand -- that you can eat Soylent 100% or hell, 95% of the time, and you'd be healthy and not die. And most people were actually complaining about that, that everything's been so rushed.

Soylent in its current form is nothing new. I am no authority, but it probably isn't the best either, with only a few mere months' worth of research. I'm sure this product isn't going to be an impending health disaster -- I doubt anyone would be dumb enough to eat Soylent till they die. But there are alternatives out there (the OP mentions a few) that are likely better-tested. Soylent's one claim to fame may as well be its better marketing (pretty much everyone in that company's a marketer).

Re:Soylent: Gruel today, gruel tomorrow by meowface on Monday May 27, 2013 @11:31PM (#5777868)
Agreed. I think it could be a useful product, even if the majority of people probably would not want to replace all of their meals with it.