News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Wintersmith – a flexible static site generator. Parent comment

Re:Wintersmith – a flexible static site generator by toddmorey on Monday May 27, 2013 @11:09AM (#5774886)
Is Middleman (middlemanapp.com) an intentional omission? (Meaning, did it fail one of your requirements for review?)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Wintersmith – a flexible static site generator by stevekemp on Monday May 27, 2013 @11:14AM (#5774904)
I knew I'd heard of that name. THere are a couple of projects listed in the README that I've not yet gotten round to.

A user submitted a bug-report to draw attention to Middleman & Yeoman, but then closed it before I got round to looking at them.

https://github.com/skx/static-site-generators/issues/2

I'll try to find some time soon to add them, and work on the repository some more.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Wintersmith – a flexible static site generator by fakeer on Monday May 27, 2013 @12:00PM (#5775094)
You have reviewed Jekyll but not Hyde(still in todo), that is literally an one sided story :-)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Wintersmith – a flexible static site generator by stevekemp on Monday May 27, 2013 @12:27PM (#5775207)
My bias is towards my own tool; the rest were picked at random, based on recommendations and my free time.

No explicit bias intended :)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Wintersmith – a flexible static site generator by flixic on Monday May 27, 2013 @11:14AM (#5774906)
After trying many, I ended up using Middleman. So I recommend adding its review.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Wintersmith – a flexible static site generator by johnbellone on Monday May 27, 2013 @11:20AM (#5774934)
Jekyll was a close second for me, but ended up choosing Middleman as well.
[ Parent | on HN ]