News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is It Possible to Be Both a Founder and a Daddy? by michaelochurch on Monday May 27, 2013 @09:30AM (#5774557)
This guy is funded by Sequoia and gets to take his daughter along with him on business trips, and hire sitters that the hotel finds (who must be expensive).

There are founders and then there are Founders. There are people who've been recognized by VCs as social equals, and who are real executives within VC-istan but still found companies; then there are the long-shot "let's see if this kid makes a miracle happen" founders on audition.

He's in the first set. He's already made it. His investors are OK with him taking his daughter on business trips, which they wouldn't be if he were some unestablished schmuck like most of us. They'd never be okay with paying for the airfare. So for him the answer is "Yes". But if you're trying to break into VC-istan, I'd say "No". It's not only the hours and travel, but also the income volatility and low wages. Of course, there are lots of businesses outside of VC-istan for which different rules apply.

Re:Is It Possible to Be Both a Founder and a Daddy? by tptacek on Monday May 27, 2013 @11:47AM (#5775031)
This is the second time I've seen you claim on HN that it's impossible to simultaneously be a company founder and a new parent. This will be the second time I'll tell you that's just not true. Plenty of early-stage founders have young kids. My kids are 13 and 11, and I was a founder when (a) both of them were born and (b) again before they both started school while my wife Erin was working.

This thread is full of other people who have done similar things.

The problem I have with your comments about starting companies and parenting is not that it discourages new parents from considering starting a company, but that it once again posits that tech startup founders are an oppressed class. But consider raising a kid while working full time cleaning offices. Or as a construction worker. We sometimes sound like we actually believe that only the wealthy in this country successfully raise kids, but we obviously must know that isn't true at all.

[edited to depersonalize the response; sorry]

Re:Is It Possible to Be Both a Founder and a Daddy? by wpietri on Monday May 27, 2013 @12:23PM (#5775191)
Amen on the horseshit. My co-founder at my last company had 3 kids under 5, and his wife also worked at a demanding job. He was aces.

If anything, I think being a parent made him more focused, better at time management. Young, first-time founders tend to see "work more hours" as the solution to a lot of problems, even when the right answer is something else entirely. He was great at saying, "No, that isn't worth doing," or finding clever ways to solve problems. A lot of his product ideas came out of the time he spent after putting the kids to bed, and I think having the break plus the quiet time away from the office was great for his creativity.

It was also an advantage in recruiting. I could honestly tell engineers that we didn't believe in working stupid hours. And that engineers with kids would be able to have dinner with their families, because that's what the CEO did himself.

Re:Is It Possible to Be Both a Founder and a Daddy? by michaelochurch on Monday May 27, 2013 @01:39PM (#5775646)
I said that if you're trying to break into VC-istan when not yet established, you probably can't do that while raising kids. I said nothing about starting a company (possibly as a side project that turns into a lifestyle business) in general.
Re:Is It Possible to Be Both a Founder and a Daddy? by tptacek on Monday May 27, 2013 @01:41PM (#5775659)
Again, this is the problem with your "VC-istan" term. I think you should stop using it, because it's helping you slink out of debates that you'd be better off losing. I'm sure there's some definition of "VC-istan" for which entry is foreclosed for new parents, but if you're referring to "first externally funded Silicon Valley startup", you're wrong.
Re:Is It Possible to Be Both a Founder and a Daddy? by floody-berry on Monday May 27, 2013 @09:40AM (#5774592)
A comment he made on the article:

> In fact, twice we actually had negative cash (ie, far more debt owed to the bank than cash) and struggled to even make payroll or cover rent. At one point we had to layoff over half of our employees and make payroll by taking an advance out on a credit card – that was just before my wife gave birth.

I guess being a wealthy founder with a family is a sound idea, but being employed by one, not so much.