News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:US entertainment industry to Congress: make it legal for ... by sliverstorm on Monday May 27, 2013 @12:43AM (#5773454)
I'm not sure we need be this terrified. Gear-heads made similar claims about freedom as cars became more complicated and less user-serviceable. But you know what? While cars have their issues, and are indeed now more difficult to service, they have continued to get better- a lot better. The last totally user-serviceable cars were made in the 60's and early 70's. Many of the improvements come from improvements to manufacturing, but the sophisticated electronic control systems are integral.

Now, the internet is of course not an automobile. But my point is, batshit insane legislation aside, perhaps maintaining the maximum amount of freedom is not as valuable as we think? I'd hate to be stuck with late 60's cars.

Re:US entertainment industry to Congress: make it legal for ... by kunai on Monday May 27, 2013 @12:50AM (#5773467)
Your analogy is completely flawed. Automakers aren't putting root exploits in vehicles that allow override by the government when it detects you're going to an "unauthorized" music dealer.

And are late 60's cars really that bad? There weren't any of the fallback mechanisms we take for granted, such as airbags, so people drove better. Styling is questionable, but many cars on the road look and drive like bloated, lifeless wagons. The cars were actually fun to drive...

Maybe I'm being romantic about 60's vehicles, but if you care to argue, please do so.

Re:US entertainment industry to Congress: make it legal for ... by sliverstorm on Monday May 27, 2013 @01:04AM (#5773501)
I probably wasn't clear enough, but I wasn't trying to compare cars to rootkits. I agree this rootkit thing is ridiculous. Rather, I was thinking about the general idea that ordinary Joes ought to be as worried about freedom as we are being.

Late 60's cars are not horrific or anything like that. But be realistic- the performance, longevity, emissions, driveability, and weight of engines have all come a very very long way, and in my personal experience a multitude of other characteristics have made leaps and bounds as well, such as suspension- though that is mostly just more sophisticated now, rather than more electronic.

I love old sports cars, and I love their soul. But if we are talking engineering, ground yourself- take a gander at this article: http://grassrootsmotorsports.com/articles/soccer-moms-reveng...

Re:US entertainment industry to Congress: make it legal for ... by krichman on Monday May 27, 2013 @05:21AM (#5774010)
We should absolutely be more worried about digital rights and freedoms, because freedoms with your car are already pretty well secured. You can loan it to a friend, you can sell it, you're allowed to take it apart and mess with it on your own property, you can publish manuals on how to take it apart and mess with it without fear of legal action, the manufacturers aren't going to add a camera to watch your every move, etc.

And there's no equivalent of manufacturers selling a car such that it is impossible for you to swap out parts unless Microsoft has signed them.

In this increasingly digital world, many people are going to be totally beholden to Microsoft, Apple, et al in terms of what software they are allowed to install on their devices. In certain cases they are already constrained by the ideology of one provider. This should frighten you. And it's even more frightening that we can already legally prevent people from altering the software on their own device to make it behave as they wish.

In sum, your car is never going to refuse to take you to an adult bookstore, that's why it is different.

Re:US entertainment industry to Congress: make it legal for ... by nitrogen on Monday May 27, 2013 @01:53AM (#5773609)
This analogy only holds if there's a corresponding improvement in engineering to come from giving up freedom on the Internet, which there is not.