Re:Why Time and Newsweek Will Never Be The Economist
by tptacek on Friday April 24, 2009 @12:59AM
(#577000)
And if you can get over the absolutely massive amount of wasted paper in each issue, Vanity Fair is a far better subscription to have than Time.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why Time and Newsweek Will Never Be The Economist
by winanga on Friday April 24, 2009 @01:34AM
(#577032)
Yep, agreed. When is someone going to port Adblock Plus over to the offline world?
Re:Why Time and Newsweek Will Never Be The Economist
by brandnewlow on Friday April 24, 2009 @01:42AM
(#577038)
What if you set up an intermediate magazine service? People subscribe to magazines through you, paying a hefty premium. They get their magazines with all the ads town out of them a day later than usual.
Re:Why Time and Newsweek Will Never Be The Economist
by jfornear on Friday April 24, 2009 @02:59AM
(#577117)
I doubt that model would hold considering the fact that ad-blockers are too cheap to subscribe to a service like that, but why not just pay the magazine a little more in subscription fees?
The aura of anti-advertising among the tech crowd is somewhat sad. The ads are on consumers' side in terms of keeping the price of content down. That being said, I too use Adblock. :) Advertisers need to bring the annoyance level down a notch (especially with those automatic-popout-video-player-banner-deals-with-broken-mute-buttons).
Re:Why Time and Newsweek Will Never Be The Economist
by winanga on Friday April 24, 2009 @03:11AM
(#577127)
Stupid question - does HN have ads? I've never looked at it without Adblock!
Re:Why Time and Newsweek Will Never Be The Economist
by jfornear on Friday April 24, 2009 @03:23AM
(#577134)
Nope. I don't think pg cares about generating any kind of financial gain from HN aside from leads to successful YC companies.