Along with pointing our which HN rule was violated, how about adding some meat to the debate in order to demonstrate the type of post HN encourages? Such as actual readership/traffic numbers for the WSJ.

For example this news piece claiming WSJ numbers are up after Murdoch took over: http://www.businessinsider.com/wall-street-journal-readershi...

I'm not saying the news story is accurate, but it does contribute to the conversation whereas the parent comment and yours do not.