News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Soylent Campaign by josh2600 on Tuesday May 21, 2013 @05:41PM (#5747095)
Ad Hominem attacks don't strengthen your argument.

From what I can tell, the Soylent team appears to be pursuing their goals in an admirably scientific fashion. Although there's quite a bit of work to do, I recall an article from a couple of days ago on HN that was talking about the wonderful work the big guys are doing. This quote from General Mills is priceless:

>In a public comment posted on the FTC website, our friends at General Mills pointed out that under the IWG guidelines, the most commonly consumed foods in the US would be considered unhealthy. Specifically, according to General Mills, “of the 100 most commonly consumed foods and beverages in America, 88 would fail the IWG’s proposed standards.” [1]

I understand your disagreement, I disagree with your ad hominem attack and think that there may be some merit to the Soylent team and their claims, especially when taken in light of the General Mills comments.

[1]http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2013/05/19/de...

Re:Soylent Campaign by w1ntermute on Tuesday May 21, 2013 @06:16PM (#5747324)
> This quote from General Mills is priceless

There is a world of difference between "unsafe" and "unhealthy." I am not claiming that frozen dinners are healthy. Far from it - I avoid them like the plague. However, they are not going to land you in the hospital in the short term.

> think that there may be some merit to the Soylent team and their claims

The fundamental issue is that statements like "there may be some merit" might be sufficient for trying an iPhone app. It is NOT sufficient for trying a radically new diet like this one.

Re:Soylent Campaign by josh2600 on Tuesday May 21, 2013 @06:23PM (#5747382)
>It is NOT sufficient for trying a radically new diet like this one.

To you. It's your opinion, not mine. You could say "The FDA would strongly condemn something like this" or "I think this is unsafe" but you can't say it is not sufficient for everyone just because you feel that way.

You can't make blanket claims that apply to all of humanity; being an absolutist only works if you're a Sith Lord.

Re:Soylent Campaign by DanBC on Tuesday May 21, 2013 @06:31PM (#5747450)
> You can't make blanket claims that apply to all of humanity

Except Soylent are doing exactly that.

Re:Soylent Campaign by josh2600 on Tuesday May 21, 2013 @06:52PM (#5747584)
That's called marketing. When a business does it, you take it with a grain of salt. When an individual says something like this, you have to take it a little more seriously otherwise you're not giving the person their due.

But I do appreciate your point and you did make me scratch my head when I first read it.

Re:Soylent Campaign by chetanahuja on Tuesday May 21, 2013 @07:05PM (#5747658)
admirably scientific fashion

Let me point you to a randomly chosen scientific study: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20856266

Now you point me to something similar for this new wonder food.