I agree with your point, but just one quibble: from what I'm reading, you've made the argument that the probability of yahoo as a whole failing is the probability to watch during a merger.
I don't see from your argument that probability is a bad tool in analyzing this situation.
In other words, probability is more or less irrelevant, because if you fail it means a small loss which does not risk the company's future, on the other hand, if you don't acquire, and the small business succeeds big time, then that is a big loss, and may eventually kill you.