YouTube's Fine - Analysts Don't Understand Internet Peering

Re:YouTube's Fine - Analysts Don't Understand Internet Peering by dasil003 on Wednesday April 22, 2009 @02:26AM (#573605)

Obviously it's very easy to play semantic logic games and come up with a free association that "proves" how on-topic you were. Here's the problem though:

People here think justin.tv's bandwidth costs are relevant to the article. They don't think you political agenda about piracy is relevant.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:YouTube's Fine - Analysts Don't Understand Internet Peering by volida on Wednesday April 22, 2009 @02:42AM (#573612)

He didn't even gave a number about the costs. His comment was vaque and certainly not helpful, to me.

So, explaining how my comment is relevant is semantic games? Whatever.

My comment was just an indirect way through a joke (obviously provocative!), that expressed my opinion that they avoid telling they are profitable.

And what "political agenda"? I didn't even expressed an opinion about piracy.

[ Parent | on HN ]