News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mercury Colonization by hcarvalhoalves on Sunday May 19, 2013 @09:17PM (#5735274)
I believe being underwater wouldn't save you from the biology impact of a cataclism if you rely on it for food.
Re:Mercury Colonization by uvdiv on Sunday May 19, 2013 @09:18PM (#5735278)
There's no biology on Mercury either, so whatever system you use there, would work as well or better underwater.
Re:Mercury Colonization by lmm on Monday May 20, 2013 @05:40AM (#5736741)
One of the biggest points of the article was that Mercury has abundant available energy from the sun - just stick up some solar panels, or the thermal gradients are perfect for running turbines - large enough to supply a lot of power, but not so large that engineering becomes hard. While there are some energy sources available underwater, it would seem to be much more difficult to exploit them.
Re:Mercury Colonization by uvdiv on Monday May 20, 2013 @05:58PM (#5740360)
or the thermal gradients are perfect for running turbines

They're completely useless, actually: they're in insulating rock with no ability to conduct away heat. As soon you try to exploit a temperature gradient, you destroy it.

Re:Mercury Colonization by hcarvalhoalves on Sunday May 19, 2013 @10:15PM (#5735461)
Yeah I think so. It wasn't comparing to Mercury though, just pointing out underwater probably isn't an oasis.