spending that the private sector would not take on...
The Internet would never...private telephone companies
(dial up) would never...SpaceX would not...only something
like a national government
Note your continual use of "only" and "never". You made this a black and white question. I'll freely admit that the government can build infrastructure; you should admit that history shows that independent individuals can as well. Then the question returns to the relative cost-efficiency of each provider, which was my original point. And that's an empirical question: could these services be rendered for less than $5.62 trillion in taxes per year?
Re:Tesla Raises $1B from Stock and Bond Sale
by stephencanon on Monday May 20, 2013 @11:31AM
(#5738159)
The relevant question is not “could” they be rendered for less than $5.62 trillion, but “would” they be. From what I have observed, privatization of infrastructure does not typically result in cost savings; corporate profits soak up whatever was previously “government waste”.
Again, government investment in infrastructure makes a lot of sense, and happens, when the economics do not make sense for a private company.