Re:Skype backdoor confirmation
by Sami_Lehtinen on Saturday May 18, 2013 @07:26AM
(#5728555)
There are also truly distributed solutions like Bitmessage. https://bitmessage.org/
Re:Skype backdoor confirmation
by johnchristopher on Saturday May 18, 2013 @08:04AM
(#5728624)
Thank you!
I was thinking about MTUA, mail, crypto/privacy and bitsync yesterday and was wondering if there could be a new mail system that would be encrypted and decentralized by default (à la bitsync/bittorrent).
Bitmessage seems to closely match what I had in mind.
check out syndie : http://syndie.i2p2.de
Re:Skype backdoor confirmation
by err_badprocrast on Sunday May 19, 2013 @04:40AM
(#5732280)
I believe the differentiation is that Skype routes calls p2p by default, so wiretapping them is hard. It may be possible for Skype to record calls, but only when it's routed through Supernodes - a mode usually reserved for when firewalls prevent a p2p connection.
Call metadata like to/from, time, and call length are stored - as is all text.
But the whole purpose of the new handouts app is that all clients are syncd. That's kind of hard if 3rd party apps don't have the same ability. Then all you're left with is useless encrypted messages.
I'll also continue to say how extremely disappointed I am that none of the major IM players (not Google, not Apple, not Microsoft, not Yahoo, not Facebook) wants to implement OTR encryption in their chat apps. Google even removed their fake "OTR" from the new Hangouts app, which I believe only hid your logs from yourself, not from Google themselves.
[1] - http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/17/business/concerns-arise-on...