Re:The theory of relativity in words of four letters or less
by whatgoodisaroad on Friday May 17, 2013 @01:05PM
(#5725505)
Am I being pedantic? That really should be four letters or fewer.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The theory of relativity in words of four letters or less
by breadbox on Friday May 17, 2013 @01:23PM
(#5725606)
Yes to both.
Re:The theory of relativity in words of four letters or less
by pit on Friday May 17, 2013 @01:19PM
(#5725574)
Maybe he means "The theory of relativity in words of four letters or less [than the theory of relativity]" -- i.e., it is an _incomplete_ explanation -- which some of the people on this page seem to agree with.
Seriously, I thought this was extremely clever, and the short, clipped style reminds me of Hemingway or Mamet.
Re:The theory of relativity in words of four letters or less
by 3minus1 on Friday May 17, 2013 @04:59PM
(#5726660)
You don't always use "fewer" when talking about discrete units. For example, you say "less than 5 minutes ago". The same goes for measurements of length (less than 3 meters). I think "less" works here because letters is a measurement of length.