News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gmail: Introducing Actions in the Inbox by d43594 on Thursday May 16, 2013 @03:06PM (#5720454)
The question you should really be asking is why shouldn't they? The best applications out there do one thing and do it well. Awk, sed, vi(m), emacs, git. Need I go on?
Re:Gmail: Introducing Actions in the Inbox by infrec on Thursday May 16, 2013 @03:41PM (#5720669)
This is simply nonsensical. Even the applications you listed don't just "do one thing". Vim and emacs have a trillion features each. Git has way more features than some other versioning systems. When does "one thing" turn into multiple things? Within the context of the thread - when did gmail stop doing one thing? When they added filters? When they added all of the labs features? With this current announcement? Do one thing and do it well is great but defining the scope of the one thing is not something to be taken trivially.
Re:Gmail: Introducing Actions in the Inbox by tree_of_item on Thursday May 16, 2013 @09:53PM (#5722306)
What is the one thing Emacs does well?

Emacs is the polar opposite of the Unix philosophy; it's more in line with the Lisp Machine tradition. Programs like sort, uniq, and grep don't embed interpreters for dynamic languages and provide thousands of different extensions for anything from reading mail to connecting to IRC.