> Hmm, I must be missing something.
Yes, you missed the part where I said this that was a generalised comment and that I'm aware this specific attack isn't a practical real-world vulnerability.
What you're doing is that typical thing that people do online when they're so busy trying to assert their intellectual superiority that you completely miss the point that was being raised.
This can only happen if the developer is malicious relatively to the compiler. Since you're the developer, and you're trying to avoid this exploit happening to you, there's no need to worry: Just don't perform the exploit.
It sounds to me like you're saying "we need to have more research so I can avoid exploiting the Go compiler".