News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask YC News: Voting up vs. up and down by thomasptacek on Wednesday September 19, 2007 @06:14PM (#57090)
Clearly neither system works reliably, but just to put that suggestion in context:

http://reddit.com/info/2r8d8/comments

vs.

http://programming.reddit.com/info/2qbye/comments

"Quality" sounds like a good metric until you realize that upvotes mean "I agree!", not "Good comment".

Re:Ask YC News: Voting up vs. up and down by bct on Wednesday September 19, 2007 @08:06PM (#57130)
Another alternative is a two-axis system. Up-down for agree-disagree, left-right for quality.
Re:Ask YC News: Voting up vs. up and down by Jd on Thursday September 20, 2007 @12:20AM (#57242)
Does anything like this exist that you are aware of?
Re:Ask YC News: Voting up vs. up and down by oditogre on Thursday September 20, 2007 @03:50AM (#57300)
I've never heard of anything like this, though I've thought of it quite a long while back for Reddit. The problem is that it won't solve anything. Most people will still downvote / leftvote things they don't agree with and upvote / rightvote things they do agree with. If the desire to silence a dissenting opinion could be controlled by the majority of people, free speech would not be such a rare thing, let alone need to be written into law.
Re:Ask YC News: Voting up vs. up and down by auferstehung on Wednesday September 19, 2007 @06:24PM (#57093)
I agree. That is why I purposely did not equate quality with up and down voting, but left it undefined. Perhaps a solution could be that the quality of a comment was ranked by the number and quality of sub-comments. We would have the beginning of a highly ranked comment thread, for example.