Re:Executable Archaeology: The Case Of The Stupid Thing Eati...
by DanBC on Tuesday May 14, 2013 @04:23AM
(#5703576)
Do userland utilities like this have the potential for big scary security holes? Or is Windows 7 / 8 better than that now?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Executable Archaeology: The Case Of The Stupid Thing Eati...
by rainforest on Tuesday May 14, 2013 @11:29AM
(#5705541)
In a sense Windows (Vista) and 7 and 8 have encouraged targeting user-mode processes. The garden variety IRC bots that ship with the "hacking tools" available through various YouTube channels all run in user-mode.
The most common (at least based on my ~10 instance) technique is malware that installs itself into %APPDATA% and sets itself to start on boot. The executable then launches some process (like services.exe) and injects its own code (known as RunPE).
I'm not sure how prolific exploitation of user-mode binaries is, but the damage that can be done from user-mode is non-trivial.
Re:Executable Archaeology: The Case Of The Stupid Thing Eati...
by kevingadd on Tuesday May 14, 2013 @05:29AM
(#5703773)
If they're configured to run as administrator, they can get up to a lot of mischief even without running in the kernel. For example, they can open ports to the internet and add firewall rules...
More importantly, if they're installed on a large number of machines, they become an easy target for malware authors - observe the number of exploits targeting vulnerable link handlers like steam and uplay's, where it was possible to invoke an arbitrary executable from a hyperlink.