News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google's Driverless Future by pkandathil on Friday May 10, 2013 @11:26AM (#5686689)
A person in security told me that a big fear they have is car bombs. You would now be able to send groups of cars to a location without risking human life. That us good enough reason to not want self driving cars. I still think some of the functionality can be used for accident prevention.
Re:Google's Driverless Future by BruceIV on Friday May 10, 2013 @11:54AM (#5686880)
Car accidents kill orders of magnitude more people than terrorists do. I think even if the number of car bombings jumped to 10 times its current level with autonomous cars society would still likely come out ahead.
Re:Google's Driverless Future by raldi on Friday May 10, 2013 @11:28AM (#5686710)
Would that also have been a good enough reason not to want regular cars?
Re:Google's Driverless Future by ollysb on Friday May 10, 2013 @12:51PM (#5687268)
Yeah that's a bit like not allowing mobile phones because they can detonate bombs.
Re:Google's Driverless Future by conanbatt on Friday May 10, 2013 @11:46AM (#5686824)
Well, that would require at least one suicide bomber.

Its a legitimate concern, you wouldnt want a car getting hacked and doing all kinds of stuff, like deliberately causing an accident.

Re:Google's Driverless Future by ivix on Friday May 10, 2013 @12:10PM (#5686976)
Because setting up a remote control car with a camera is currently impossible?

That's trivially easy in comparison to forcing an autonomous car to do something dangerous.