Re:What's up, bot? Google tries new Captcha method
by DavidSJ on Saturday April 18, 2009 @03:35PM
(#568646)
Actually, I think the noise proves his point. The fact that adding so much noise was necessary means computers are pretty good at solving that problem, and it has to be made next to impossible for humans before computers can no longer solve it either.
Re:What's up, bot? Google tries new Captcha method
by ctingom on Saturday April 18, 2009 @02:46PM
(#568582)
Wow, I could barely make out the audio captcha!
Re:What's up, bot? Google tries new Captcha method
by pavel_lishin on Saturday April 18, 2009 @04:14PM
(#568685)
But you could still make it out, right?
Re:What's up, bot? Google tries new Captcha method
by antiismist on Saturday April 18, 2009 @04:29PM
(#568700)
I couldn't figure out the audio captcha. People who are blind probably have better hearing, so maybe it's easier for them.
Re:What's up, bot? Google tries new Captcha method
by harpastum on Saturday April 18, 2009 @05:29PM
(#568759)
I've heard a lot of anecdotal evidence that young blind people have better-than-average hearing, but what about the elderly?
I'm not sure anyone I know over 70 years old could pass either of those captchas. I guess the only consolation is that most people that age often have younger people sign up for them.
Re:What's up, bot? Google tries new Captcha method
by tlrobinson on Saturday April 18, 2009 @09:30PM
(#568977)
I certainly couldn't. Perhaps they rely on blind people having heightened auditory senses.
Re:What's up, bot? Google tries new Captcha method
by qeorge on Saturday April 18, 2009 @03:00PM
(#568595)
Wow, that's incredible how much noise they've added. I couldn't make it out myself. Its bordering on unusable IMHO.
Still, I wouldn't be surprised if a computer could get 1 in 4, which is plenty to be effective. They're still only using the 10 digits for the signal.
https://www.google.com/accounts/NewAccount