Re:Techno Viking Takes Youtube Uploader To Court
by anExcitedBeast on Friday May 10, 2013 @12:52PM
(#5687278)
How about filming police, or people activity participating in crime? And if you allow exceptions for that, who's to decide what constitutes crime and what happens to people who film perfectly legal acts that look suspicious?
Re:Techno Viking Takes Youtube Uploader To Court
by Xylakant on Friday May 10, 2013 @02:44PM
(#5687927)
Filming or taking pictures in itself is not a problem and perfectly legal. Go film all you want. You're just not allowed to publish those pictures. So if you see a suspicious act, take your pic, hand it to the police and let them deal with it.
You can film the police and film public figures all you want, as long as they're acting in their public capacity. You're allowed to film Angela Merkel doing her state visit, going to the beach with Barack Obama and later publish that clip. You're not allowed to film her naked in her private backyard.
The border between the two is sometimes hard to determine, so there are some lawsuits about that, but all in all it's pretty clear.
Re:Techno Viking Takes Youtube Uploader To Court
by terolacu on Friday May 10, 2013 @08:14PM
(#5689269)
I answered here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5687247
I don't think that law is unusual, in Argentina we have it too, and sounds like something very basic anyone would want (though creeps don't seem to understand it, and act surprised when they realize such law exist, and start complaining on their lack of freedom and whatnot, lol). I thought it kind of came packaged with the IP laws that the US pushed everywhere.