News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:In Hours, Thieves Took $45 Million in A.T.M. Scheme by thisrod on Friday May 10, 2013 @12:48AM (#5684706)
The card doesn't matter: if the bank can afford to mass produce it, the cost to duplicate it will be small change in a $45 million heist.
Re:In Hours, Thieves Took $45 Million in A.T.M. Scheme by untog on Friday May 10, 2013 @02:11AM (#5684869)
Not quite. Chip and PIN adds an additional layer of security (PIN verification upon payment, verified against a secure chip) that is much, much more difficult to duplicate because the internals aren't known. Magnetic stripes are open to everyone.
Re:In Hours, Thieves Took $45 Million in A.T.M. Scheme by raverbashing on Friday May 10, 2013 @04:44AM (#5685232)
Actually, the internals are known, it would be security through obscurity otherwise (cough GSM cough)

The mag stripe is as safe as giving everybody your CC number (with CVV code)

Which chip-and-pin two things happen:

- the chip won't work without the pin number being input

- only one transaction is authorized at a time

- the chip is not duplicable (the information needed to duplicate it can't be read from the card)

Re:In Hours, Thieves Took $45 Million in A.T.M. Scheme by chiph on Friday May 10, 2013 @09:06AM (#5685930)
It's not just the cost of the new cards -- all the payment terminals would have to be upgraded as well. AFAIK, unless you're in a major international city (NYC, Washington DC, SF) the terminals in the stores & restaurants don't know what to do with a chip-only card.